William Jansen vs Joe Tyler Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 Jul at 02:06 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
W. Jansen vs J. Tyler

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Jansen 1 - 0 Tyler
They have played 2 sets in total, with William Jansen winning 2 and Joe Tyler winning 0. The last match between William Jansen and Joe Tyler was at the M15 Dublin, 28-07-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Carpet, with William Jansen getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jansen | 1 |
| Tyler | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M15 Dublin(07-28-25)
W. Jansen vs J. Tyler H2H Profile
W. Jansen vs J. Tyler Match Preview:
- Jansen has an edge in second serve points winning 46.7% compared to Tyler's 41.98%. Could this indicate a service advantage for Jansen?
- Tyler excels in return games, capturing 52.69% off opponents' second serves, outshining Jansen's 41.26%. Does this suggest Tyler is stronger in returning serves?
- In terms of first serve returns, Tyler leads with a 28.07% win rate, while Jansen manages 23.2%. Is Tyler's return game a decisive factor here?
- Jansen shows resilience under pressure with 61.54% breakpoints saved compared to Tyler’s 51.85%. Could this impact match outcomes?
- While Jansen wins 46.67% of their matches (last year), Tyler has a slightly better success with 52.5% wins. Nevertheless, how does this reflect their overall performance?
- Both players perform best on hard surfaces, but Jansen has a superior indoor hard win rate at 57%, while Tyler excels with a 52% win rate on hard courts. How does this affect their compatibility on different surfaces?
- Although both compete often in Futures/ITF $10K tournaments, Jansen claims a slight edge with 53.85% wins over Tyler's 52.5%. How does this experience weigh in?
- Jansen encounters lower-ranked opponents (average rank 397.87), while Tyler typically faces tougher competitors (average rank 96.47). How might the quality of opponents they've faced influence their performance?
- In closely contested matches, Jansen holds a 50% win rate in deciding sets, surpassing Tyler's 25%. Does this suggest Jansen performs better under high-pressure scenarios?
- Jansen converts 28.57% of breakpoints, whereas Tyler converts 38.1%, hinting at Tyler's efficiency in crucial moments. Does Tyler’s breakpoint conversion give them a critical advantage?
Editorial Prediction (July 28, 2025, UTC):
Both players display strengths in different areas, making this match predictably intriguing. Jansen's consistency in saving breakpoints and winning deciding sets could provide a significant edge during pivotal match points.
Alternatively, Tyler's expertise in returning serves and superior breakpoint conversion rate suggests they might seize key opportunities more effectively. This hints at Tyler being able to disrupt Jansen's service games and capitalize on crucial moments.
Given these statistics and recent performances, Tyler seems to possess a slight edge over Jansen due to their returning strength and breakpoint efficiency. Thus, Tyler is more likely to secure a victory in this upcoming tennis match.
William Jansen vs Joe Tyler Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
W. Jansen vs J. Tyler H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 6 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:12:9 | Average Match Time | 1:12:9 |
| 58% (29/50) | 1st Serve % | 73% (30/41) |
| 66% (19/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (20/30) |
| 57% (12/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (5/11) |
| 75% (3/4) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
| 39% (16/41) | Return Points Win % | 38% (19/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
W. Jansen Recent Matches Played
J. Tyler Recent Matches Played

W. Jansen vs J. Tyler Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.17% (39/33) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.23% (83/79) |
| 54.27% (89/75) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.49% (190/172) |
| 54.00% (837/713) | Games Win/Loss | 51.81% (1836/1708) |
| 57.14% (28/21) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.47% (54/47) |
| 66.67% (8/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49.09% (27/28) |
| 27.27% (3/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 0.4 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 301 | Aces Total | 350 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 117 | Total Double Faults | 206 |
| 1:30:57 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 375.99 | Average Opponent Rank | 195.27 |
| 66% (2789/4201) | 1st Serve % | 63% (3299/5242) |
| 68% (1902/2789) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2249/3299) |
| 51% (727/1412) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (885/1943) |
| 45% (174/390) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (204/511) |
| 39% (1614/4149) | Return Points Win % | 39% (2088/5316) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/5) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59.09% (39/27) | Futures W/L | 51.23% (83/79) |
| 55% (39/71) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (83/159) |
| 45% (9/20) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (12/33) |
| 48% (10/21) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (17/41) |
| 85% (39/33) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (85/71) |
| 13% (39/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (85/12) |
| 18% (33/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (77/12) |